INDUSTRIES / INSURANCE
Claims and servicing transformation require more than new technology. We map root causes, redesign processes, align ownership and measure operating improvement.
WHAT WE HELP SOLVE
Simplify end-to-end claims workflows, handoffs, documentation and client communication.
We begin by making the claim journey visible end to end: where files wait, where information is requested twice, and which handoffs create rework. EPIF sequences the remedy so steps are eliminated and standardized before any system change is specified. The outcome is a shorter cycle, fewer touches per claim, and a documented basis for whatever technology investment follows.
Build consistent procedures, capacity models and measurement systems.
Consistency is a product of design rather than effort. We define procedures, capacity model and measurement system together, so volumes, skills and service commitments are reconciled rather than assumed. Each activity is traced to an accountable owner and the measures that govern it. Teams get a model they can run daily; leadership gets a defensible view of the capacity the work actually requires.
Choose automation and AI when they improve service, accuracy or cost and operate within defined controls.
Automation earns its place only once the process beneath it is sound. We work the intervention hierarchy in order: eliminate, simplify, standardize, integrate, automate, then AI. The technology question opens when the data, controls, ownership and fallback exist to support it. Every candidate is assessed on service, accuracy and cost against a baseline agreed before the build starts.
EPIF APPLIED / INSURANCE
How the four stages play out on a claims process, where lead time, leakage and customer experience are decided by the same handoffs. Illustrative and deliberately high level.
Map the claim from first notice to settlement and measure where it waits: triage, information requests, adjuster queues and supplier handoffs, by claim type and value band.
In hand: A measured baseline the business and Finance both recognize.Rank by lead time recovered and by leakage risk. Clear triage rules and ownership of the customer contact usually rank ahead of new platforms; straight-through handling comes once the simple claims are truly simple.
In hand: A ranked plan, least-risk change first.Change triage and ownership first, with claims leadership and the controls team, then automate the claim types the evidence supports.
In hand: Controlled change with the controls intact.Report lead time, touch time, reopen rate and leakage indicators against the baseline, by claim type.
In hand: A result defended with numbers, not asserted.The full method: seven governed decisions and the questions executives ask first
RELEVANT HISTORICAL DELIVERY
Selected historical Alacer case studies - not necessarily from the industry named above.
THE EPIF DIFFERENCE
EPIF makes the intervention decision before the technology commitment, with a clear baseline, controlled execution and results that can be defended.
Explore EPIF ↗︎